What is the entrapment defense?

The entrapment defense is grounded in the principle that law enforcement officials should not induce a person to commit a crime that they would not have otherwise committed. This defense acknowledges the role of government agents in potentially creating criminal behavior that would not have emerged in the absence of their influence.

In situations where a person is convinced to engage in illegal activities because of pressure, manipulation, or coercion from law enforcement, the defense aims to show that the individual's actions were not truly voluntary due to this undue influence. The key factor in establishing entrapment is demonstrating that the defendant had no predisposition to commit the crime before being approached by authorities.

The other options do not accurately capture the essence of entrapment, as they relate to other concepts in criminal law. For instance, committing a crime with prior intention addresses premeditated actions, while confessing to a crime voluntarily concerns admissions of guilt rather than the influence of law enforcement. Preventing another from committing a crime pertains to intervention rather than the inducement of a crime, which does not align with the entrapment concept.