What offense is committed if a parent pays a referee to influence the outcome of a soccer game?

The offense of rigging a publicly exhibited contest specifically pertains to the manipulation of the outcome of a competitive event for the purpose of obtaining a benefit, such as financial gain or a favorable outcome. In this scenario, by paying a referee to influence the outcome of a soccer game, the parent is engaging in actions that disrupt the integrity of the game. This behavior falls under the definition of rigging because it does not merely involve a personal transaction but actively seeks to alter the result of a sport, which is presented to the public as a fair competition.

While bribery could be considered in this context, as it involves offering something of value to sway someone's decision, the specific charge of rigging a publicly exhibited contest more accurately captures the essence of the offense committed, focusing on the altered competitive expectations inherent in public sporting events. Therefore, the correct designation of the offense aligns with the context of public contests, emphasizing the tampering aspect in an officially sanctioned event.